AMITABHA BHATTACHARYA
In public perception, important ministries are the economic ones. This explains why IAS officers vie for posts they are least equipped for. Regular lateral induction at higher levels, especially in the economic and infrastructure ministries, may discourage such tendencies and foster competition.
Sardar Patel’s stirring statement during the Constituent Assembly debates sounds prophetic now. Patel had warned that “you will not have a united India, if you have not a good all-India service which has the independence of mind to speak out its mind, which has a sense of security.”
In 70 years, the composition of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) as also the state of the nation they are to serve have undergone major changes. But the rationale for all-India services in our federal structure and the high ideals set by Patel and supported by Ambedkar continue to inspire civil servants and millions aspiring to join their ranks.
However, India today, especially since the early 90s, is very different from what it was at the time of independence. Is the IAS equipped to handle the myriad challenges it encounters now?
Broadly speaking, the IAS can take some legitimate pride in the steady and largely inclusive development of the nation as also for maintaining its unity and integrity envisioned in the constitution. By the same logic, it has also to accept a large part of the responsibility for our failures. In fact, the responsibility of the IAS is perhaps more direct for our dismal state of human development.
Many factors have contributed for the IAS to be found wanting in its ability to cope with the demands of an aspirational India, the most important being the quality of recruits, lack of sectoral specialisation, political interference and corruption. And these are often interlinked. Unless these concerns are admitted and addressed, further institutional decline of IAS as a system cannot be prevented.
Not the best anymore
Firstly, there has been a noticeable change in the quality of recruits, more so from the liberating 90s. The increasing numbers appearing at the civil services examination give a distorted picture. The relevant question is their quality and whether the IAS continues to draw a fair share of the country’s best talent. Admittedly, the IAS today is more representative of our society, thanks to democratisation of education and affirmative action. But is it attracting the brightest from each social group? Why are there huge regional disparities?
A multi-pronged approach is needed to address the issue. Admitting the quality of recruits as a major concern, campaigns in major institutions in each state should highlight the challenges, opportunities and rewards of the IAS which no other service in the world can perhaps match. Further, the examination process should be shortened and the number of subjects restricted. Additionally, the upper age limit should be reduced at least by five years for each category and the number of attempts curtailed to two or three. Regular recruits should spend their best productive life serving in the districts, not in the arduous examination process. Moreover, the background and marks of successful candidates should be in public domain.
Generalists won’t do
Secondly, for many reasons, formulation of policies has become complex, demanding specialisation. A clueless officer cannot guide others based only on common sense. Therefore, after their first decade of immersion in the district, officers should be encouraged to acquire sectoral specialisation, based on their aptitude, qualification and preference. The IAS associations should take the lead in helping the state and the union governments undertake this major exercise.